fix: skip Obj/EndObj for definitions without direct captures
#257
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Obj/EndObjwrapper for definitions that have no direct capturesA = (program (B))withB = (expr) @xwould lose B's capturesWhy
When a definition only calls other definitions (no direct
@namecaptures), wrapping it inObj/EndObjwould overwrite the called definition's result with an empty object. The called definition already handles its own scope.Before: A's
EndObjcreates empty{}, losing B's{x: node}After: A has no wrapper, B's result passes through correctly